Lieberman: We won’t have peace for generations

He said he gets asked all the time why he is against hope, and he responds that he is for hope but against illusions.

“It must be understood that signing a comprehensive agreement in which both sides agree to end the conflict and end all of their claims and recognize Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people is a goal that is not achievable in the next year or in the next generation, so any historic compromises or painful concessions won’t help,” he said.

The best that could come out of the talks was a long-term interim agreement with the Palestinians, Lieberman said.

He promised that his party would fight against further construction freezes and unilateral concessions.

“Seventeen years should be enough time to realize what is and is not possible. I know there is pressure to continue the freeze, but I don’t know a single reason to do so.

Listing the summits that launched peace processes in the past, Lieberman mocked “the many grandiose productions of the international peace industry,” which had led to “many cocktails, many talk shows. No results.”

Israel had already suffered enough from the “adventures and experiments of irresponsible politicians,” he said.

Lieberman asked what would happen if Israel reached a deal with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, and then Hamas said it was not legitimate because by Palestinian law, Abbas’s term ended in January 2009. Israelis needed to ask themselves what would happen if there was a Palestinian election following the creation of a Palestinian state and Hamas won.

The speech was seen as an attempt by Lieberman to take advantage of Netanyahu’s leftward shift and win over disgruntled Likud voters. He even made a point of singling out National Infrastructures Minister Uzi Landau, now of Israel Beiteinu, and other former Likud officials in the room.

Lieberman said that Israel Beiteinu had come a long way since the days when it could be dismissed, and now was a force to be reckoned with.

Sources close to him said he felt an obligation to tell the truth about diplomatic realities. They said his views had only been strengthened by what he had seen over the past year and a half as foreign minister.

Jpost.com